|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
09/11/2017 |
Actualizado : |
09/01/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Informes Agroclimáticos |
Autor : |
GIMÉNEZ, A.; CASTAÑO, J.P.; CAL, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; SCHIAVI, C.; WADSWORTH, C. |
Afiliación : |
AGUSTIN EDUARDO GIMÉNEZ FUREST, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSE PEDRO CASTAÑO SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ADRIAN TABARE CAL ALVAREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS IGNACIO SCHIAVI RAMPELBERG, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CRISTINE WADSWORTH MAIORANO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria). |
Título : |
Informe agroclimático 2017 - Situación a Setiembre. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2017. |
Páginas : |
4 p. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
AGROCLIMA; AGROCLIMATOLOGÍA; BOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO; CARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA; DIRECCION VIENTO; ESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS; ESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS; ESTACIONES INIA; ESTADO DEL TIEMPO; ESTRÉS HÍDRICO; GRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS; GRAS; HELIOFANOGRAFO; INFORMACION SATELITAL; INFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2017; INUNDACIONES; LLUVIAS DIARIAS; MAXIMA; MEDIA; MINIMA; PANEL SOLAR; PERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS; PLUVIOMETRO; PRECIPITACION NACIONAL; PREVENCION HELADAS; PRONOSTICO; SENSOR; SIMETRICO; TANQUE A; TERMOCUPLAS; TERMOHIDROGRAFO; VARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS; VELETA. |
Thesagro : |
AGROCLIMATOLOGIA; CAMBIO CLIMATICO; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; ESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS; ESTRES HIDRICO; EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; HUMEDAD; HUMEDAD RELATIVA; LLUVIA; METEOROLOGIA; PERSPECTIVAS; PLUVIOMETROS; PRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO; SENSORES; SISTEMAS; SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION; SUELO; TEMPERATURA; TERMOMETROS. |
Asunto categoría : |
P40 Meteorología y climatología |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/7862/1/Informe-agroclimatico-INIA-GRAS-setiembre-de-2017.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02145nam a2200817 a 4500 001 1057737 005 2018-01-09 008 2017 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, A. 245 $aInforme agroclimático 2017 - Situación a Setiembre.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2017 300 $a4 p. 650 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS 650 $aESTRES HIDRICO 650 $aEVAPORACION 650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION 650 $aHUMEDAD 650 $aHUMEDAD RELATIVA 650 $aLLUVIA 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aPERSPECTIVAS 650 $aPLUVIOMETROS 650 $aPRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO 650 $aSENSORES 650 $aSISTEMAS 650 $aSISTEMAS DE INFORMACION 650 $aSUELO 650 $aTEMPERATURA 650 $aTERMOMETROS 653 $aAGROCLIMA 653 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGÍA 653 $aBOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO 653 $aCARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA 653 $aDIRECCION VIENTO 653 $aESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS 653 $aESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS 653 $aESTACIONES INIA 653 $aESTADO DEL TIEMPO 653 $aESTRÉS HÍDRICO 653 $aGRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS 653 $aGRAS 653 $aHELIOFANOGRAFO 653 $aINFORMACION SATELITAL 653 $aINFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2017 653 $aINUNDACIONES 653 $aLLUVIAS DIARIAS 653 $aMAXIMA 653 $aMEDIA 653 $aMINIMA 653 $aPANEL SOLAR 653 $aPERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS 653 $aPLUVIOMETRO 653 $aPRECIPITACION NACIONAL 653 $aPREVENCION HELADAS 653 $aPRONOSTICO 653 $aSENSOR 653 $aSIMETRICO 653 $aTANQUE A 653 $aTERMOCUPLAS 653 $aTERMOHIDROGRAFO 653 $aVARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS 653 $aVELETA 700 1 $aCASTAÑO, J.P. 700 1 $aCAL, A. 700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G. 700 1 $aSCHIAVI, C. 700 1 $aWADSWORTH, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
22/02/2021 |
Actualizado : |
22/02/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
CABRERA, D.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; UBERTI, A.; ZOPPOLO, R. |
Afiliación : |
CARLOS DANILO CABRERA BOLOGNA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ANDRES RODRIGUEZ BRUNO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. UBERTI, Federal University of Fronteira Sul - UFFS, Chapeco?, Brazil.; ROBERTO JOSE ZOPPOLO GOLDSCHMIDT, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Productive behavior of 'Williams' pear (Pyrus communis L.) grafted onto different rootstocks. [Conference paper]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Acta Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 145-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22 |
ISSN : |
0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) |
DOI : |
10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. |
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present differences among the tested rootstocks. 'BA29' induced higher fruit weight in comparison to 'OH×F69' and a firmer fruit compared to 'OH×F69' and 'OH×F40', in the 2016/17 growing season. For productivity, it was observed that 'OH×F40' was superior in the 2014/15 growing season, while in the 2016/17 growing season all Pyrus rootstocks were substantially superior. Results showed that Pyrus rootstocks had better performance compared to quince under optimal conditions but were less robust when climatic conditions (chill units and precipitation) were not good for pear cultivation.
@ International Society for Horticultural Science. MenosAbstract:
The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present difference... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CLIMATIC CONDITIONS; FRUTICULTURE; Interstem; QUINCE; URUGUAY. |
Thesagro : |
MEMBRILLO. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 03214naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1061741 005 2021-02-22 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0567-7572 (print); 2406-6168 (electronic) 024 7 $a10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22$2DOI 100 1 $aCABRERA, D. 245 $aProductive behavior of 'Williams' pear (Pyrus communis L.) grafted onto different rootstocks. [Conference paper].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Published 5 February 2021. In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1303: XIII International Pear Symposium, Montevideo, Uruguay. Conveners: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera. Editors: Roberto Zoppolo, Danilo Cabrera, D. Granatstein. 520 $aAbstract: The most widely used rootstocks for pears are of the genus Pyrus and Cydonia. The objective of this study was to evaluate yield and fruit quality of 'Williams' pear trees on different rootstocks. The experiment was conducted at the Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria INIA Las Brujas, Uruguay. 'Williams' trees were planted in 2003 and evaluated during four consecutive growing seasons starting in 2014/15. Rootstocks were 'OH×F40' and 'OH×F69' (Pyrus communis), 'BA29', 'EMC', and 'Adams' quince (Cydonia oblonga). For quinces, 'Beurre Hardy' (Pyrus communis) was used as an interstem. Spacing was 4.5 m between rows, varying the space between plants, according to the expected vigor of each rootstock. For 'OH×F40', 'OH×F69' and 'BA29' plants were spaced 1.70 m (1,307 trees ha‑1), 'Adams' 1.50 m (1,481 trees ha‑1), and 'EMC' 1.30 m (1,709 trees ha‑1). The experimental design was a randomized block with five treatments (rootstocks), and four replications. Fruit diameter, average fruit weight, flesh firmness, soluble solids content, number of fruits, and yield were evaluated. The data were submitted to analysis of variance by the F test and, when significant, the means were compared through Tukey?s test at 5%. In the 2015/16 and 2017/18 growing seasons there was low production mainly due to insufficient accumulation of chilling during the winter of 2015 and 2017, respectively. Fruit diameter and soluble solids content did not present differences among the tested rootstocks. 'BA29' induced higher fruit weight in comparison to 'OH×F69' and a firmer fruit compared to 'OH×F69' and 'OH×F40', in the 2016/17 growing season. For productivity, it was observed that 'OH×F40' was superior in the 2014/15 growing season, while in the 2016/17 growing season all Pyrus rootstocks were substantially superior. Results showed that Pyrus rootstocks had better performance compared to quince under optimal conditions but were less robust when climatic conditions (chill units and precipitation) were not good for pear cultivation. @ International Society for Horticultural Science. 650 $aMEMBRILLO 653 $aCLIMATIC CONDITIONS 653 $aFRUTICULTURE 653 $aInterstem 653 $aQUINCE 653 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, P. 700 1 $aUBERTI, A. 700 1 $aZOPPOLO, R. 773 $tActa Horticulturae, February 2021, N°1303, p. 145-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2021.1303.22
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|